Every decline should survive a review.
Give analysts one queue for personhood cases, linked rings, evidence packs and the full record of who decided what.
Fraud evidence is useful only when an analyst can inspect it, trace its source and explain the resulting action months later. Workbench keeps the model output beside the human decision.
Analyst productivity is a model-governance concern, not a cosmetic product feature.
Case PRM-20481
- Model record
- Reproducible
- Reason codes
- Ranked with source times
- Analyst action
- Manual review
- Export
- JSON or CSV
What the module returns
The output is structured for a decision engine and readable by the person who must review it later.
Prioritised queue
Cases are ordered by recommended action, expected exposure, ring scope and the institution's review rules.
Ring workspace
Applications, devices, addresses and beneficiary accounts are inspected as one connected case.
Evidence export
JSON and CSV exports carry raw signal values, reason codes, score version and the final analyst outcome.
Decision log
Every override, reassignment and final disposition records the user, time and stated reason.
The model recommends. Policy and people decide.
Workbench does not hide manual judgment behind a status. It records the recommendation and the institution's final action separately.
Case created
A policy threshold or ring event opens a review with the evidence already attached.
Analyst investigates
Reason codes, graph relationships and source timestamps can be inspected without leaving the case.
Decision recorded
The analyst accepts, changes or escalates the recommendation and provides a reason.
Outcome returned
Confirmed results flow back into calibration and the evidence pack remains reproducible by model version.
Test Workbench on historical applications.
We reproduce the signals available at the original decision time, then compare the ranked result with later confirmed outcomes.
Book a backtest