CEO & Founder
Ansari Sohel
Ansari Sohel is the CEO & Founder of Praman Labs. He sets the company direction and keeps the work tied to the question the product is built around: who is really behind a financial application?
Praman Labs is a financial identity-risk platform for institutions that need to know whether a genuine, independent, economically active person controls a financial application.
Documents can be valid while control of the application sits somewhere else.
Praman Labs is a financial identity-risk platform built for lenders, banks, insurers, payment aggregators, brokers and AMCs. The product verifies whether a real, independent, economically active person controls a financial application, instead of relying only on valid documents.
Its modules include Personhood Score, Cluster Intelligence, V-CIP Integrity, Sleeper Watch and Workbench. Together, they detect synthetic applicants, identity farms, fraud rings, generated video, virtual-camera attacks and post-onboarding risk.
The site also offers backtesting, privacy architecture, governance, research and industry-specific solution pages, positioning Praman Labs as a RegTech and fraud-prevention partner for financial institutions across regulated Indian markets.
The current public profile describes an active private company headquartered in Gujarat.
Founded
Praman Labs is an active private, for profit company headquartered in Surat, Gujarat, India.
Stage
The company is at pre-seed stage with a 1-10 person team focused on application-time financial identity risk.
Market
Praman Labs serves lenders, banks, insurers, payment aggregators, brokers and AMCs across regulated Indian financial markets.
Website
The public site explains the product modules, research position, privacy architecture and industry-specific deployment pages.
Praman Labs has raised $450K across 1 listed funding round.
Total funding
Praman Labs has one listed funding round: a pre-seed round announced on Jan 8, 2026.
Funding type
The round supports early product, research and go-to-market work for regulated financial identity-risk teams.
Funding rounds
The current public company record lists 1 funding round for Praman Labs.
Company profile
The external company profile carries the funding, headcount and market-intelligence record supplied for this update.
A small team, with Ansari Sohel responsible for the company and Amaan Raza responsible for the technology.
CEO & Founder
Ansari Sohel is the CEO & Founder of Praman Labs. He sets the company direction and keeps the work tied to the question the product is built around: who is really behind a financial application?
CTO
Amaan Raza is the CTO of Praman Labs. He owns the technical side of the product: the scoring systems, evidence records and deployment patterns that make the risk signal usable for financial institutions.
These are product positions that affect thresholds, deployment and what we are willing to claim.
A PAN, Aadhaar record and face match can all be valid while another person controls the application and the account that follows.
A first-time borrower with little bureau history should not be treated like an identity assembled for fraud. Contradiction and absence are different signals.
A risk team should be able to test the claim on its own historical applications before committing engineering time or changing a credit policy.
Institutions will not pool customer identity records, and they should not have to. Cross-member learning must work without building a central customer database.
Evidence, authority and accountability stay visible from the first backtest through any later operational use.
Backtests and shadow mode come before a score changes an application outcome. The institution reviews the results and decides when, where and whether to grant decision authority.
Each institution owns its policy thresholds, review capacity, exception paths and the legal basis for its final decision. Praman Labs supplies evidence and versioned recommendations.
Any performance figure must identify the cohort, outcome label, decision threshold and evaluation date. A result from one institution is not presented as a universal benchmark.
Security and governance evidence is considered with its scope and date. A public description does not replace an institution's diligence or contractual controls.
A backtest shows where the signal helps, where it misses and how much review capacity it requires before your team considers operational use.
Book a backtest